Oilgae Club - an Online Community for Algae Fuel Enthusiasts Worldwide.

Topic of the week

  • Microalgae Harvesting

    There are various filters used for microalgae harvesting. Which filtration method is most efficient and cost-effective for usage in large scale harvesting and why? Is there any other method that can effectively replace the process of filtration.

Thoughts and ideas from Oilgae Club members (5)

  1. AlgaeBill 2 years ago

    Comment Arrow

    Greetings,
    Harvesting algae - o what fun - i personally spent 2 years on this one - !!! with a rather lage budget !!!
    all depends on what types/density you are harvesting and a another very important fact - what are you using the algae for afterwards. this does impact on the method.and the majority of micro algae go straight through a belt filter,screen !!


  2. Vlothimir 2 years ago

    Comment Arrow

    http://www.altere.com/articles/category/separation/

    Hello! What is this material? What kind of ,,textile,, ? Thanks


  3. Lucygreen 2 years ago

    Comment Arrow

    Use of automated methods, though costly, will serve the purpose, the recovery of the harvested material is not very complicated
    While
    Semi-automated methods such as belt-filters, micro strainers etc.,though relatively cheaper and less-energy consuming can cause a lot of yield loss.


  4. Monterio 2 years ago

    Comment Arrow

    Belt-press seems to be comparatively cheaper than other harvesting methods. The costs of the belt-filters range from between between $150,000 to $180,000 each.

    Capital costs for belt filter presses vary with the size of the equipment. Vendor estimates vary from $47,500 (0.5 m belt, approximate capacity of 500 dry pounds per hour (~0.22679618499999998 tons)) to $115,000 (1.5 meter belt with approx capacity of 1,625 dry pounds per hour).


  5. Anna 2 years ago

    Comment Arrow

    Semi-automated filtration methods seem to be the method of choice for harvesting algae. For example, belt-filters are something which can be tried out as they consume relatively less electricity.